From an email:
In February 2008, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Riegel v. Medtronic that because certain medical devices are subject to pre-market approval by the FDA, federal law prevents state law claims that allege negligence on behalf of consumers. This ruling potentially puts soldiers at risk by taking away their right to hold medical device manufacturers accountable for faulty products. Without a legislative solution, any costs attendant to defective devices, including rehab and perhaps long-term care, will have to be paid by the VA without reimbursement through the tort system. Our veterans who served nobly in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as our Vietnam War, Korean War, and World War II veterans, should not worry that their families or caretakers may be stuck with the tab for the carelessness of device makers.
The following are a few examples of medical devices that, in the case of malfunction, consumers do not have legal recourse to hold the manufacturer accountable:
- Prosthesis
- Pacemakers
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
- Orthopedic hips and knees
- Ocular Implants
- Cochlear Implants
- Interactive Wound and Burn Dressings
- Spinal Cord Stimulator (Implanted)
- Stair Climbing Wheelchair
As the above list reflects, such devices are very important in the lives of many veterans today. Technology available to veterans today has allowed our service men and women to live much fuller lives than was previously imaginable. Innovation is extremely important – but ensuring device safety is also a concern of many relying on these devices for greater quality of life.
For more information on this issue in Iowa, please contact Michelle Rich at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , or 515-243-2000.




